This looks to be a good article exposing some of the (many) hazards of having/believing a prosperity based Gospel. Looking forward to reading it.
This looks to be a good article exposing some of the (many) hazards of having/believing a prosperity based Gospel. Looking forward to reading it.
Remember back when you were a child? When everything seemed so simple? Rainbows had pots of gold at their end and the blue sky was blue because that’s how God painted it? Life seemed simple then. Anything seemed plausible and it took little faith to believe it. We could ask our dads a technical question and upon getting an absurd response — run with it.
I heard one child say, “Whenever I see sunlight streaming through the clouds, I think it means that God is speaking to someone.” This stopped me short. My immediate response is, “No — it just has to do with the sun hitting the particles in the clouds and refracting.” But then I stop and wonder. Why can’t it mean more?
Imagine being outside on a mild day. It’s partly cloudy and the sun is shining in the better half of the sky. A cloud moves in front. It’s a kodak moment to be sure. I’ve always liked looking at imagery from nature and relating it to faith. God has created it all and reveals Himself through all. If we ever seize to praise Him — the inanimate rocks will pick up the slack.
I picture in my mind many different images of God. Not only is He holy and supreme but He is also my (heavenly) Father. The clouds move past the sun — they shield us from the blinding radiance of the One who created all. And He speaks to us!
There is no question about it — God is supremely holy. He is perfect. Before coming to knowledge of Him my sins made me pitch black and a doomed vessel before Him. Even now, having been saved by His grace, washed clean by His blood my flesh still could not withstand His full glory. When Jesus took Peter, James and John onto the mountain, God enveloped himself in a cloud. Just as a taste is enough to change my life forever, the full glory of God would burn me to the core.
But then He talks! Streams of sunlight coming through the clouds — the voice (and glory) of God to His people. It’s not so unreasonable to think as such. God spoke to the disciples and His son on that mountainside and He speaks to us today if we choose and want to listen.
It’s so easy to get caught up in the things of this world. It’s so easy to get caught up in the technicalities, the sciences and the reasonings. It’s nice to step back and have the trusting faith of a child that God really does talk to His people. I know that the next time I see streams of sunlight filtering through the clouds the question on my heart will be, “What is God trying to say?”
This is one of the first pieces I wrote for the internet at least 6 years ago...
Julian the Apostate was the Roman emperor from 361 to 363. He’s called the Apostate because he converted from Christianity to theurgy and is considered the last Pagan emperor (he revived paganism in Rome as a counter to the thriving Christianity).
He was the author of many letters. In particular interest to me, he comments on the popularity of Christianity:
“These impious Galileans not only feed their own poor, but ours also; welcoming them into their agapae, they attract them, as children are attracted, with cakes.”
“Whilst the pagan priests neglect the poor, the hated Galileans devote themselves to works of charity, and by a display of false compassion have established and given effect to their pernicious errors. See their love-feasts, and their tables spread for the indigent. Such practice is common among them, and causes a contempt for our gods.”
Variation from here. Originally heard in the sermon Jesus and Politics by Tim Keller
It’s interesting to think that agapae towards the poor, both “ours” and “theirs”, was one of the primary identified catalysts behind Christian adoption (it’s no wonder there are over 2000 Biblical passages dealing with those on the margins of society). One can only hope we continue to re-discover that catalyst—over the past few months especially I’ve found it to be at the heart of missional living.
Yes. This was another old post.
Sometimes, late in the game, justice is done and the truth served. Just two weeks ago, the President of El Salvador, Mauricio Funes, announced that on 16 November his government would bestow its highest honour, the Order of José Matías Delgado, posthumously, on the six Jesuits who were murdered twenty years ago on that same date.
In the early hours of 16 November 1989, US-trained commandos of the Salvadoran armed forces entered the campus of the Jesuits’ university, the Universidad Centroamericana (UCA), and brutally murdered the six Jesuits, together with two women who were sleeping in a parlour attached to their residence. The Jesuits were: the university rector Ignacio Ellacuría, 59, an internationally known philosopher; Segundo Montes, 56, head of the Sociology Department and the UCA’s human rights institute; Ignacio Martín-Baró, 44, the pioneering social psychologist who headed the Psychology Department and the polling institute; theology professors Juan Ramón Moreno, 56, and Armando López, 53; and Joaquín López y López, 71, founding head of the Fe y Alegría network of schools for the poor. Joaquín was the only native Salvadoran, the others having arrived long before from Spain as young seminarians. Julia Elba Ramos, the wife of a caretaker at the UCA, and their daughter Celina, 16, were eliminated to ensure that there would be no witnesses. Ironically, the women had sought refuge from the noise of gunfire near their cottage on the edge of the campus. Julia Elba cooked for the Jesuit seminarians living near the UCA.
...
Like many others, the UCA martyrs were killed for the way they lived, that is, for how they expressed their faith in love. They stood for a new kind of university, a new kind of society, a ‘new’ church. Together with their lay colleagues, they wrestled with the ambiguities of their university in a country where only a tiny minority finished elementary school and still fewer could meet the required academic standards to enter university and to pay the tuition fees. The Jesuits and their colleagues concluded that they could not limit their mission to teaching and innocuous research. Yes, they did steeply scale tuition charges according to students’ family income. More importantly, they sought countless ways to unmask the lies that justified the pervasive injustice and the continuing violence, and they made constructive proposals for a just peace and a more humane social order. As a university of Christian inspiration, they felt compelled to serve the truth in this way. That is what got them killed.
...
The UCA martyrs also stood for a different kind of society. Ellacuría, like the theologian Jon Sobrino who lived with him but was travelling at the time of the killings, was an eloquent advocate for what he called a ‘civilisation of work’ to replace ‘the prevailing civilisation of capital.’ With great prescience he foresaw that this would not be principally the work of governments but rather of civil society, whose different sectors have to organise and point the way to new social models, beyond both communist collectivism and capitalism. In this, Ellacuría believed, ‘the poor with spirit’ would play a privileged role.
Finally, the UCA martyrs stood for a Church of the poor (in the words of Pope John XXIII) which would serve as a vanguard of this new society, modelling equitable social relations and solidarity; a prophetic Church like the one that Archbishop Romero symbolises, which gives credible witness to the fullness of life that God promises.
...
Dean Brackley SJ is Professor of Theology and Ethics at the Catholic University in San Salvador.
This describes one of the more life changing events in my life. It happened 3 summers ago in Mozambique. I thought it pertinent for this site as my wife and I prepare to embark full time to Africa.
Every week without fail, Luis makes two trips: one to the Maputo jail and one to an AIDs hospital. While staying at the orphanage, we had the opportunity to join him in these missions. Today I’ll turn your attentions to our time at the AIDs hospital. Looking back, it was one of the more impacting times for myself (and I think that I’m not the only one of the eleven of us who would say that).
The hospital was actually in the town we were staying in, Matola. It is divided into gendered floors, the bottom couple being for the newer patients and the upper couple for the highly contagious terminal patients. We rode a chappa to the hospital and upon exiting were met with an interesting site. The building itself looks kind of like any other bland government building – honestly there is not much to set it apart. It is surrounded by a fence with a gate but security wasn’t an issue. I expected to have to go through something in order to get in, but we just walked right on through the gate (I don’t think the security booth was even being manned by anyone at the time). Upon entering the hospital we were met with drab, dark halls on the bottom floor. It was rather depressing – in comparison our hospitals look like amazingly bright and cheery places. I remember the colors as gray scale and just blah. The second and third floors weren’t much better although numerous windows made for a much brighter atmosphere. On these patient floors, the stairs emptied into a kind of common room that had tables and chairs setup (it was here we talked to and prayed with the patients). On either side of the common rooms were the halls with patient rooms.
All of the patients here had AIDs. Most had other, secondary diseases as well, the most common being tuberculosis. Generally speaking, its not AIDs that kills people – its the opportunistic secondary diseases that their bodies can’t take care because of immunodeficiency. The onset of these diseases is generally what takes people to these hospitals to spend their final days. The patients on the two floors we couldn’t go onto where in their final stage of life. The highly contagious form of tuberculosis is mostly what we heard they had. The plan in future years is to bring HEPA masks and robes so that we can go onto these floors but lack of appropriate safety equipment kept us from talking with these patients this time.
The patients on the two floors we could go onto where dieing as well, some from diseases other than tuberculosis, I would guess. Many of them looked too weak to even be up and moving around, but come out they did. I remember praying for one woman, my hand on her shoulder as we generally did, and quickly moving my hand off in fear that I would break her. It felt like i was touching bone (and that’s all most of these individuals were – skin and bones).
All eleven of us did not descend on the hospital at once; rather, five went the first week and six the next. I went in the first group. We had originally thought that we would just be going around to rooms, chatting briefly and then praying with the occupants. The common room was a surprise to us (as was Luis telling us that someone needed to stand up and share). I decided that I would take the opportunity to do that on the guys floor and felt led to share briefly and broadly about what I was reading in Isaiah and how their lives were important to us and more importantly, were important to Jesus. We then paired up and prayed for everyone of them. We next went up to the girls floor and did the same. As the “have something to share” thing to our group slightly by surprise, none of the ladies with us had anything in particularly to share so I once again took the lead. Rather than talk about the same thing I did on the guys floor, I decided that it’d be much more worthwhile to talk about Hosea. Don’t ask me why – it was a last minute change as when I stood up the Isaiah bit was still on my mind – but Hosea it was and it seemed to go alright. And after the sharing we followed the same routine, praying for everyone individually.
There were several important aspects of this visit. If I haven’t said it before, I’ll say it right now – this was one of the most important things we did in my mind. At least, it was one of the most impacting things we did to me. For one thing it was one of the more emotional things we did. I’m generally not an emotional dude but it was impossible not to tear up, standing in front of these hopeless, dieing people and not tear up. Their environment just felt wrong and depressing. They really had no hope to ever leave that hospital. They knew there days were numbered and that there was pretty much nothing that they could do about it. And what where we to do? How where we to pray knowing that it would take one crazy miracle of God to ever get them free of that hospital? It’s important to be able to look deep inside of the dark and hopeless places and know that the light of God can penetrate even there and that’s what we were there to do, and what Luis is there to do week after week. It’d be easy to find places like this here in the states but we shelter ourselves off from it for no good reason. That’s definitely one thought I took away.
Other things I took away were much more trivial (or at least they feel trivial compared to the above). One – God will give you the words if you trust. Two – I want to be given the words more, I need to put myself in that kind of situation more, however you want to word that. Three – One of the oddest sites I have ever seen occurred on the ride to the hospital (because it happened on the way there, and with everything else going on, it’s automatically lumped with the hospital experience in my brain even though it doesn’t necessarily deal directly with it). As we were driving past a poor village, one much like the one I’ve posted pictures of with dirty roads and small poorly built houses that lack what we consider basic needs (running water, etc), I never expected to see a brand new, blazingly clean and white, four door Mercedes sedan pull out from its dirty streets. The contrast of rich and poor was never clearer (or more inappropriate, or so it felt). That will be a fuller conversation for another post yet it is tied intimately to the whole hospital experience, which is why I mention it here.
I would post pictures but I don’t have any of the hospital. It is illegal in Mozambique to take pictures of government building, monuments and officials and not knowing if the hospital falled into one of those categories I decided against whipping my camera out. Better a post without pictures than time in a Mozambiquan jail I think. The lack of color in this post is more fitting anyways to the environment of the hospital I think.
This is pretty amusing. Fox, covering health care reform protests last week, use footage from several months ago (different event/much bigger crowd) instead of the footage from the actual, less attended, event. Have some integrity!
This is something I wrote many moons ago…again — edited for spelling/grammar and not much else.
Some time ago I defined missional as:
Being bent on making Jesus the number one priority and because of this seeing his/herself as sent on mission for Jesus.
Now, from that simple definition its obvious that Jesus is to be at the heart of missional living but worked out, what does this look like?
At a fundamental level, a missional heart looks towards God’s working in history. There are several broad motifs that can be used to describe God’s work: creation, fall, redemption and restoration. Creation of course refers to the formation of this universe and everything in it ex nihlio. Ex nihlio means “from nothing” and is important because it really is solely God that is the catalyst for all. John 1 says that all things were created through Jesus and that His life is our light (which parallels the creation event in Genesis). This is also important because right from the beginning man was created to enter into God’s story. Unfortunately though things weren’t just happy with no end. In spite of things being perfect originally, sin entered into the world — the fall happened. Man disobeyed God and unleashed a destructive force into the world that is tearing it to bits. Luckily, though, this isn’t the end either. In order to restore man and creation to Himself, God became flesh, moved into our neighborhood and died at our hands — the perfect sacrifice through which we have redemption. It seems like this is the end of the story for a lot of individuals and groups. God, though, wants to see all of creation restored unto Himself; according to His word — in the end it will be. In the meantime we are charged with taking the redemption He has granted us everywhere we go, seeking the restoration of all. We are to aid the restoration of broken places until His parousia (the return of Jesus).
This isn’t a pattern that just comes with Christ though — it is evident in the earliest pages of the Bible. When God called Abram (Gen. 12) and he followed, God ended His conversation with Abram letting him know that all peoples on the earth would be blessed through Him. Even before the redemption of Christ is understood, God’s heart to see His creation redeemed to Himself and restored is clearly visible.
To illustrate this more vividly, the story of Sodom and Gomorrah makes for interesting reading. We all know the story, right? These are wicked cities where no man cares for righteousness. Truth be told, “evil sexual deeds” are what they are most known for (and really, nothing else). Abraham pleads with God to stay judgement, dependent on righteous men being found within the city. Of course none are and the cities are destroyed (along with Lot’s wife who looked back upon it).
Nine times out of ten when you hear people talk about Sodom today it’s in regards to homosexuality and other such sexual deviancy (at least in my experience). While it’s true that this was a periphery issue which led to its destruction, sexual deviance was merely symptomatic of a much, much worse underlying problem (one we’d do good to make note of in our society). To flesh it out I’m heading to the prophets to see what they have to say about the nation of Israel in relation to Sodom.
49 “This was the sin of your sister Sodom: she and her daughters were proud, had abundance of food, and enjoyed carefree ease, but they did not help the poor and needy. 50 They were haughty and committed abominable crimes before me. So, when I saw it, I removed them. 51 Samaria has not committed half the sins you have; you have done more abominable deeds than they did. You have made your sisters appear righteous by all the abominable things you have done. 52 So now, bear your disgrace, because you have given your sisters reason to justify their behavior. Because the sins you have committed were more abominable than those of your sisters; they have become more righteous than you. So now, be ashamed and bear the disgrace of making your sisters appear righteous.
Ezekiel 16:49-52
This tells us several interesting things about the state of Sodom prior to its destruction as well as what directly leads to its destruction. Pre-destruction, Sodom was a nation incredibly blessed — they had an abundance of food and enjoyed “carefree ease” which tells me they really didn’t have a concern in the world (and sounds a bit like other nations I know of) — it seems people had everything they needed. God’s blessing though terminated on themselves (one way to think of this — no restoration occurred) and unfortunately this seemed to lead them down the path of pride which led directly to the unrighteousness that gets them destroyed. I find it interesting that the first piece of the unrighteousness puzzle is that they didn’t help the poor and needy among them. If we are to take the prophet seriously — this is one of the first warning signs of this deeper heart issue: pride. As we fill ourselves with pride our focus is drawn more and more inward until there is no concern for anything else. This resultant focus inward also ultimately leads to the “abominable crimes” before God as we only become concerned for our own personal desires/needs/wants.
There is one major point to take from these verses in regards to walking in God’s story in history and it is really quite simple: God’s blessing shouldn’t ever end with you. Everything you have and everything you are shouldn’t just flow inward — it should naturally be flowing out. You can’t/won’t do this if you have a proud and haughty heart towards God and those around you so don’t let that happen. At a very base level, we must check ourselves against pride. If we take these verses seriously this means asking (a) am I doing what I can to support the poor and needy of my neighborhood (either spiritually poor and needy or physically poor and needy)? and (b) am I performing any “abominable crimes” before God?
Ezekiel isn’t the only prophet that speaks of Sodom. Isaiah in numerous places echoes the words of Ezekiel and expounds upon them. Starting in chapter 1 at verse 10 Isaiah calls Israel Sodom and Gomorrah and continues to get seriously in their face. According the Isaiah, the Lord basically says he’s tired of their sacrifices and that He doesn’t want them. He says that He can’t tolerate their festivals and sabbaths and assemblies. God says He looks the other way when they pray. All of this would be pretty incredulous for the Israelites to hear as God had instituted it all and expected it of them. The fact remains though that they were doing all this while tainted with impure blood. Outward they had all the workings of redemption but inward they were vile, sinful beings. God’s blessing was extending no further than themselves. What does God call them to?
16 Wash! Cleanse yourselves! Remove your sinful deeds from my sight. Stop sinning! 17 Learn to do what is right! Promote justice! Give the oppressed reason to celebrate! Take up the cause of the orphan! Defend the rights of the widow!
Isaiah 1:16-17
First and foremost — repentance from all the sinning. Secondly though they are to take the restoration they know with them and develop some since of a social conscience. In other words, their redemption doesn’t terminate with themselves; instead, they should turn it into restoration for others.
This though certainly isn’t the only place this theme can be found. Isaiah 58 is another great passage that speaks directly to this. It starts just as the Isaiah 1 passage calling into question the outward religious actions (this time chiefly fasting) when inner hearts are as black as night.
3 They lament, ‘Why don’t you notice when we fast? Why don’t you pay attention when we humble ourselves?’ Look, at the same time you fast, you satisfy your selfish desires, you oppress your workers.
Isaiah 58:3
Just as before the problem is that everything is turned inward — it’s their own selfish desires that they are fulfilling. God’s blessing is ending solely with them. But what does God want?
6 No, this is the kind of fast I want. I want you to remove the sinful chains, to tear away the ropes of the burdensome yoke, to set free the oppressed, and to break every burdensome yoke. 7 I want you to share your food with the hungry and to provide shelter for homeless, oppressed people. When you see someone naked, clothe him! Don’t turn your back on your own flesh and blood! 8 Then your light will shine like the sunrise; your restoration will quickly arrive; your godly behavior will go before you, and the LORD’s splendor will be your rear guard. 9 Then you will call out, and the LORD will respond; you will cry out, and he will reply, ‘Here I am.’ You must remove the burdensome yoke from among you and stop pointing fingers and speaking sinfully. 10 You must actively help the hungry and feed the oppressed. Then your light will dispel the darkness, and your darkness will be transformed into noonday.
Isaiah 58:6-10
It’s the same theme repeated: restoration to those that need it. We even get echoes of the Great Commandment part 2 here: love your neighbor as yourself because they are your own flesh and blood. They are no different than you are.
To kick this discussion off I wrote that a missional heart is one joined with God’s working in history and it really is. The drive towards missional living comes from this understanding that we are a part of God’s story and that redemption doesn’t end with us — there is a clear drive towards seeing restoration around us. In the passages I used from the Old Testament this looks likes working towards getting ourselves straightened out (rooting the sin out of our lives) and then taking care of the poor and needy and sick and orphaned and widowed — essentially all of those on the margins of society. It’s important to note here though that this isn’t something we have to do (as if our own redemption is dependent on it). Rather it is something we should be driven to as it lies at the very heart of who we are now as redeemed beings. If we aren’t taking the redemption we’ve been given to those around us (seeking the restoration of all to God) we have some pretty serious questions we need to be asking ourselves.
As an aside, this developing heart I see in those around me is exciting. It excites me to see those in my community and like-minded communities join together to see actual change in the surrounding areas. It’s exciting to see money going straight to missional work and bringing Jesus to those that don’t know Him rather than padding ourselves with multi-million dollar buildings and technology systems that in the end don’t really matter all that much. It’s exciting to see the focus taken off of ourselves and placed where it should be: the cross of Christ which can then filter it to others. The cross is like a prism — focusing on it doesn’t render a reflection of ourselves, rather it refracts it to wherever is necessary. And I’ll end with that at the moment knowing full well that this topic of “missional” isn’t one that will be decided in just a couple of posts. Look for more coming in the future.
This was originally published several years ago. I did go through and make slight edits for grammar, etc.
A while ago, I had the opportunity to talk about Communion in house church. With the celebration of Jesus’ resurrection at Easter, it seemed fitting to do a communion service. As to what I said, I figured I’d write the general gist for those of you who might be curious or who missed out on the fun of that evening. The talk started with a discussion about what communion is. Depending on your background, you might have heard it labeled “the Lord’s Supper” or the Eucharist and as a practice it stems from Jesus’ last supper with His disciples before His crucifixion. Confirmed by the Gospels, this supper was the passover meal which proves to be interesting because Jesus takes specific elements from the Jewish feast and applies them directly to Himself. In truth, there is a lot more of the passover meal that points to Jesus then just this one part (but we are going to limit our discussion for the time being). The first passage from the Bible we are going to look at is Matthew 26:26-30:
26:26 While they were eating, Jesus took bread, and after giving thanks he broke it, gave it to his disciples, and said, “Take, eat, this is my body.” 26:27 And after taking the cup and giving thanks, he gave it to them, saying, “Drink from it, all of you, 26:28 for this is my blood, the blood of the covenant, that is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins. 26:29 I tell you, from now on I will not drink of this fruit of the vine until that day when I drink it new with you in my Father’s kingdom.” 26:30 After singing a hymn, they went out to the Mount of Olives.
Essentially, as you can see from the aforementioned passage, communion involves the giving of thanks to God for bread and wine, recognizing what those elements mean in the context of Christ and then sharing them together around the dinner table. We could pull more from these verses but I really want to take a look at both the why we do it and the how we do it which is fleshed out elsewhere in the New Testament. As such, we’ll now turn to 1 Corinthians starting in chapter 10 and continuing into 11. In these chapters, Paul is addressing specific concerns regarding the sharing of the bread and cup among the Corinthian church. To start things off here we are going to look at why we do it. In chapter 10, vs 16-17:
10:16 Is not the cup of blessing that we bless a sharing in the blood of Christ? Is not the bread that we break a sharing in the body of Christ? 10:17 Because there is one bread, we who are many are one body, for we all share the one bread.
Two primary reasons for communion are found here: it is a direct sharing in the body and the blood of Christ and in this sharing we are united with Him as one. As for the first, it’s an opportunity to set aside a moment and remember Christ’s life, what He did and how and why He died. Partaking the elements of who He was (His body and blood) directly links us up with Him and allows us in some fashion to share in His life, death and resurrection as we reflect on it. Whereas the first reason applied more individually, the second applies corporately. To flesh it out, the model prayer for giving thanks for the bread sums things up better than I could:
As this broken bread was scattered upon the hills and gathered together and became one loaf, so may Your Church be brought together from the ends of the earth into Your kingdom. (from the Didache)
I love this prayer because it so succinctly paints the picture: a loaf of bread is formed by the coming together of scattered grains from all over the countryside; likewise the church is formed by those of us partaking of the body of Christ and coming together to form a united “loaf” in the coming kingdom.
There is a third “why” to communion as well: it is an opportunity to hope for his return. In the passage from Matthew discussed earlier, Jesus says that He will not share this cup with us directly again until He returns (v29). And so, as we partake and remember and enter into what He has done, and are united, we also long for that time where once again Jesus sits and sups with His bride.
The final bit I talked about this evening is the “how” we do it. As far as “how” is concerned I’m talking about the state of our hearts more than anything else. And I’m not just talking about our individual hearts, but our heart as a community as well. To the individual response we turn first. When considering it, we need to keep in mind a couple of things the first being that we can’t share at the table of both Christ and demons. Sharing in the body of Christ is publicly picking who we choose to serve. It’s confessing “Jesus is Lord!” above all others. 1 Cor 10:21-22 says:
10:21 You cannot drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of demons. You cannot take part in the table of the Lord and the table of demons. 10:22 Or are we trying to provoke the Lord to jealousy? Are we really stronger than he is?
Paul is referring here to the partaking of sacrificial meat of false gods. In our time, because we don’t do the sacrifices, it’s more of a recognition of Jesus alone. Not Muhammad, Buddha, Shiva or any other name a person might proclaim. This also singles out any idols that might be vie-ing for our hearts attention (such as individualism, consumerism, materialism, political freedom, etc). It must be Jesus only. And I harp on the “Jesus alone” because it’s quite important. Even acknowledging other idols or gods is a direct provocation of God’s jealousy. If you look at the scope of Israeli history, provoking God’s jealousy isn’t something to be done lightly or without consequence. The language of the prophets is harsh in dealing with Israel in the eyes of a Jealous God (exile, enslavement, genocide all come to mind when thinking back to the stories in the prophets).
There is another important bit to keep in mind as far as our individual hearts are concerned, and that is what they actually look like. Coming to the table of Christ with a heart darkened by sin, shame and any other sort of evil is strongly discouraged by Paul for a pretty straightforward reason: we eat and drink judgement upon ourself by showing ourselves guilty of the body and blood of Christ. That sounds harsh, I realize but look at 1 Corinthians 10:27-32:
11:27 For this reason, whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord. 11:28 A person should examine himself first, and in this way let him eat the bread and drink of the cup. 11:29 For the one who eats and drinks without careful regard for the body eats and drinks judgment against himself. 11:30 That is why many of you are weak and sick, and quite a few are dead. 11:31 But if we examined ourselves, we would not be judged. 11:32 But when we are judged by the Lord, we are disciplined so that we may not be condemned with the world.
As I sat and meditated on this, the only conclusion I could come to is that a broken heart is the state required. This should be the result of careful examination. We all have sin, shame and evil inside that we need to be giving completely over to him, letting His blood wash us clean. This is what purifies us, making us righteous and worthy to approach the table of Christ. At this time of communion especially, if we are unwilling to recognize and do this and give it all over to God, Paul says in a fairly commanding voice “It’s on your hands!” Rather than being a worshipper at Jesus’ feet, we are like the soldier throwing the spear into His side on the cross.
That pretty well covers the state of our individual hearts. Next we need to look at our corporate heart (as the body of Christ). We need to keep in mind that Communion is something that we do together. It’s not something that I just do on my own because I can, but it’s an intentional coming together of the body in remembrance of Christ. As I’ve already shown, one of the reasons we even do communion is for the unification of the body. With this in mind, it’s important to remember that communion isn’t something that we can do with division in our midst. Paul addresses this specifically in chapter 11:
11:17 Now in giving the following instruction I do not praise you, because you come together not for the better but for the worse. 11:18 For in the first place, when you come together as a church I hear there are divisions among you, and in part I believe it. 11:19 For there must in fact be divisions among you, so that those of you who are approved may be evident. 11:20 Now when you come together at the same place, you are not really eating the Lord’s Supper. 11:21 For when it is time to eat, everyone proceeds with his own supper. One is hungry and another becomes drunk. 11:22 Do you not have houses so that you can eat and drink? Or are you trying to show contempt for the church of God by shaming those who have nothing? What should I say to you? Should I praise you? I will not praise you for this!
This was a big issue to the Corinthians. Within that body there existed the problem of class warfare. The well-to-do were completely gorging themselves on the meal while the less fortunate in their midst where left with the scraps. The best metaphor I can think of at the moment is that of a potluck, but a potluck where you only get to eat according to what you bring. If all you can afford is a small side, that’s all you’re going to be able to take part of. If you can’t afford to bring anything, well, then you’re pretty much out of luck. Paul makes it pretty clear that any division like this isn’t of Christ at all. We need to be united and share in this together. I realize the example given here concerns classes (and isn’t something that necessarily affects our body) but it covers any sort of division, whether it be hardness in my heart towards a group of people, an unwillingness of some of us to accept leadership, the formation of cliches that lock people out or deciding to eat together but then going our own ways (like at solemn assembly). I’m not saying that any of this exists but we do need to be mindful of division however it might exist as we come as one to the table of Christ.
And with that we have a brief glimpse into what communion is, why we do it, and what our hearts need to look like as we approach the table of Christ.